back to flak's homepage
spacer
spacer
WEB

Archives
Submissions

MCSWEENEY'S AND MORE

Review: McSweeney's

Review: Comedy by the Numbers

Review: You Shall Know Our Velocity

Review: Mountain Man Dance Moves

Review: The Believer

Brief Interview with Dave Eggers

Profile of Dave Eggers

Interview with Gary Rudoren

Interview with Neal Pollack

Neal Pollack Anthology

Neal Pollack's website

The Decade's Best First Chapter

RECENTLY IN WEB

On the Grid: Penguin Classics Enters the Gaming Age
by Andrew Stout

The Facebook Primary
by Eric Hananoki

Goodreads
by Lavina Lee

WwiTV.com
by Louis Goddard

District Court of Delaware Hot Topics page
by Louis Cooke

Bizarre Records
by Andrew Harmon

The Name-Naming Game
by Bob Cook

Amazon's Demographic of One
by Dan Norton

Best Buy Sucks
by James Norton

Ripoffreport.com
by James Norton

More Web ›



ABOUT FLAK

Help wanted: Winter Intern

About Flak
Archives
Letters to Flak
Submissions
Rec Reading
Rejected!

ALSO BY FLAK

Flak Sunday Comics
The Spam Blog
The Remote
Flak Print [6mb PDF]
Flak Daily Photo

SEARCH FLAK

flakmag.comwww
Powered by Google
MAILING LIST
Sign up for Flak's weekly e-mail updates:

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

spacer

McSweeney's McSweeney's reprise

Following our review of McSweeney's, a brilliant little online content factory, we shot for an interview with McSweeney's editor David Eggers. Here, readers, are the unexpurgated results.

David Eggers on the McSweeney's.net movie:

[No comment available]

David Eggers on the McSweeney's most blasphemous contribution of all time:

[No comment available]

David Eggers on the McSweeney's message for the retirees of America:

[No comment available]

David Eggers on the McSweeney's.net staff, and how well everyone gets along:

[No comment available]

David Eggers on content versus form:

Almost all design is bad, and on the web, that percentage of terribleness rises considerably. Because the medium is inherently cheap-looking, there's almost no way to dignify it. So at McSweeney's, we just put the words up. It takes our web guy, Kevin Shay, about two minutes.

There are a few content sites one could name that have a good deal of money behind them, but which no one reads because of their labyrinthine link structures and slow-loading graphics. All that effort in vain. What very few designers realize, particularly the younger ones, is that most people would rather read something -- actually read the words -- than look at all of their lines and arrows and silly pictures they've screened back.

More often than not, the designer's efforts are getting in the way. Worse, the editors above them, who should be protecting the text from such pollution, are eternally cowed into thinking that design is complicated and magical, far beyond their earthly knowledge, and thus they allow the words to be mangled and obscured.

When the words finally reach the reader, the designer has, as often as not, rendered them almost unreadable, and so a reader moves on. But we've always felt that the words don't need a whole lot of help -- that a piece about searching for tigers in Ireland is not necessarily needing of a picture of tigers or of Ireland, much less blinking or screened-back ones. The words are enough, if the words are good.

David Eggers on having his arms ripped off by a piece of farm machinery:

[No comment available]

James Norton (jrnorton@flakmag.com)

ALSO BY …

Also by James Norton:
The Weekly Shredder

The Wire vs. The Sopranos
Interview: Seth MacFarlane
Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Interview
Homestar Runner Breaks from the Pack
Rural Stories, Urban Listeners
The Sherman Dodge Sign
The Legal Helpers Sign
Botan Rice Candy
Cinnabons
Diablo II
Shaving With Lather
Killin' Your Own Kind
McGriddle
This Review
The Parkman Plaza Statues
Mocking a Guy With a Hitler Mustache
Dungeons and Dragons
The Wash
More by James Norton ›

 
spacer
spacer

All materials copyright © 1999-2007 by Flak Magazine

spacer