Why You Should Care About The Writer's Strike
by Caroline Edmunds
Since the WGA strike commenced on Monday and members of the union
began to picket outside of studio lots on both sides of the coast,
almost all the major media outlets have been reporting daily from the
front lines. Many articles have mentioned the confused faces of some of the passersby, reporting that most people outside the media world knew
littleif anything at allas to why these folks were just so damn mad. It seems most
people aren't aware of the terms the two parties
are feuding over and can't imagine how any of it will affect their
lives. The reality is however, this strikeand its presently bleak outlookis something that should be paid attention to because it
marks a significant turning point in the focus of media consumption,
the greedy power of Corporate America and the future of digital
entertainment.
In case you were one of those passersby, here is a short explanation:
WGA writers and the AMPTP (which represents all the major studios and
networks) are at odds against the idea of residual compensation to
what is being referred to as "digital content." It's a blanket term to
describe any and all future means of digital consumption, but can be
seen right now through things like TV episodes that are streamed
online and original content created for the web (such as The Office
webisodes). Unlike shows that are broadcast on television or in
syndication, these digital episodes are currently residual-free,
allowing the studios keep all the profits garnered from advertisers
without having to divvy up the shares to other participants. The
writersciting these growing online trendsare demanding that they receive at least a share of these
profits. The studios, however, are saying that because the online
video technology is so new, they need more time to figure out if they
are actually making any money off it.
Whatever side you're on, that fact that the strike is not
going away cannot be ignored. Ever since the talks broke
down two weeks ago, neither side has made the move to return to the
bargaining table and both sides are indicating that they are in it for
the long-haul.
When the last strike occurred in 1988 (and lasted for five months),
the entertainment landscape was much different: cable TV was in its
infancy, VHS was only beginning to bloom. In addition, the
big studios were not what they are today. Since then, each of the
major studios have been acquired by larger, (behemoth, really) media
and non-media related companies that have not only massive amounts of
money and resources, but also shareholders to whom they must report.
And so, with their own stock prices at risk, and because they have
back-up resources such as the scripts they stockpiled in anticipation,
the unregulated, un-unionized market of unscripted TV, and episodes of
most of their major shows available for viewing online (and residual-free, natch), they see little motivation to make any concessions. The
president of the AMPTP even opined
that the unions would be willing to hold out until SAG begins
negotiations on their new contract this summerimplying that the
studios have the will and resources to wait that long. Meanwhile, you, the erstwhile viewer, have other ways of getting your fix, whether it's
TiVo, Netflix, Xbox, or MySpace. With your favorite scripted shows off
the schedule for a couple of months, why, you may even forget after
awhile that you even watched broadcast TV and may never come back.
But, perhaps you don't care about the fact that after only a week,
thousands of people are out of jobs, and even more will follow; that
production on almost every major television show has ceased, and that,
in their place, we will be getting an onslaught of lame, hastily put
together reality shows that will be bloated beyond what even the most brain-dead person could tolerate; or that you can forget about next year's new shows, because there likely will not be any. Perhaps you don't watch television, you're not invested in any entertainment media stock, or believe in the adage "Kill your television."
 |
|
 |
But, if you consider yourself someone who holds any interest in
cultural history, technological innovation, or the growing insidious
reach of our capitalist society, then you should. You should care very
much, because over the course of the next few months, the destiny of
the television medium will be revealedand everyone in the business
will be paying very, very close attention: downloads and viewing
cycles will be measured, ad revenue will be analyzed in graphs and pie
charts, DVR and HD set sales during the holidays will be noted. Soon,
people will begin to see how (if any) the shift to the Internet will
take effect: If there are no more new episodes of The Office, will we see a spike in online viewing? Sell more episodes? It still remains
to be seen. And so, the studios (acting with the guidance of
their parent corporations) have decided to gamble on this notion and
see if there will in fact be any growth.
Meanwhile, the writers and
unions will also be taking notes, because if these trends do occur, it
will strengthen their own stance on their share of digital media. And
despite whichever side makes the concession, the strike's outcome will
perhaps be most crucial, because it will validate what many, including
myself, now hold to be true: the future is online TV. In the
meantime, most of us will be glued not to our televisions, but to the
refresh button of our Internet browsers.
E-mail Caroline Edmunds at thelinus@gmail.com.
graphic by NoHoDamon