Apparently, the female body is running out of parts to be coveted. Women
throughout the country are obsessing about a certain element of their body,
and it's not their face, their hair, their breasts or even their butt.
We're talking muscles.
It may have all started back in 1991, with Linda Hamilton fiercely
performing pull-up after pull-up in "Terminator 2". Audiences were wowed by
this sweaty, rock-hard, yet attractive female. At the time, it didn't seem
that many women ran out and bought themselves chin-up bars, but it set a
precedent: Muscles on women can be sexy.
And, suddenly, the athletic female is everywhere. Extreme sports shows are no longer the
province of crazy he-men. Where Hollywood used to mock, now it praises, putting muscular
actresses like Angelina Jolie and Sarah Michelle Gellar on a pedastal. We've got Charlie's
Angels kicking ass, Lara Croft gunning people down and three female fighters
in "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon." And, happily, our culture is slowly
beginning to appreciate female athletes. They are starting to get
endorsement deals, their controversies and tantrums are starting to get coverage,
and some soccer and basketball players are actually household names. It's a part of our
latest round of worship for the young and strong, only this time it's an
equal-opportunity cult.
However, is this muscular trend in gear because women are encouraged to become
more physical, or is it the more shallow end, where athletic women are praised
simply because their physical style is what's in? If the focus on muscles
goes away, will the focus on female athletes fade as well?
Unfortunately, in our society, sheer female physical strength is typically not its own
reward. It is no coincidence that the majority of female
athletes who receive press coverage are also easy on the eyes,
posing nearly-nude in the pages of men's magazines. There are
others out there besides Mia Hamm, Anna Kournikova and
Marion Jones.
In Newsday, Barbara Walder points out that female athletes are not analyzed
the way men are, writing that, "the
formula that has long guided the coverage of women in sports is still firmly
in place today: Sensationalize and patronize, underestimate
and overpraise, and then suspend all standards."
As the trend spreads, it mixes with its forebearers to create a double standard.
Women are
encouraged by magazines and television to build strong, showy, capable muscles, but they
are also expected to maintain a slim waist, small yet shapely behind, generous
breasts and on top of all that, practically rid themselves of hair everywhere
on their body, except, of course, on their head, where it should grow as thick
and lustrous as possible.
This female body image, while providing a strong statement, is also
that of a mutant: male muscles, female form, completely lacking natural,
breeding-friendly female fat.
It is ironic that many women may be eyeing the new ideal,
thinking to themselves, "I'm going to beat the popular
perceptions of women and get strong!"; and it's this thinking that ensures
they're still prisoners of trendy ideals.
"Like many chronic dieters and new yoga enthusiasts, a good deal of the new
muscle-conscious women seem to be doomed to picking up the habit only for as
long as the trend is in style."
Being healthy and, in whatever way it is defined, attractive, should be for
one's own benefit; it should not be according to society's demands. It will be
interesting to see what female body images will be revered in the future.
Perhaps Rosie the Riveter, in all her Michelangelo mannish-glory, will come
back en vogue. We'll be finding all the supermodels drinking egg whites and
doing bench presses.
E-mail Claire Zulkey at clairezulkey@hotmail.com.