back to flak's homepage
spacer
spacer
IN THE WAKE OF SEPT. 11

Watch the Backlash
by James Norton | 9-12-01

Anti Anti-War
by James Norton | 09-24-01

"They Hate Us"?
by Clay Risen | 09-24-01

Hear No Evil
by Bob Cook | 09-24-01

For Whom the Bell Tolls
by Ben Granby | 09-24-01

Sept. 11: A UK Perspective
by Stuart Kelly | 09-24-01

The View From Andersonville
by Stephanie Kuenn | 09-24-01

Where Now?
by Clay Risen | 09-24-01

Pictures of New York
by Will Leitch | 09-24-01

Lessons Learned
by Michael Risen | 09-24-01

The Swiss Cheese Defense
by Eric Wittmershaus | 09-24-01

I Will Never See the World Trade Center
by Eric Wittmershaus | 09-24-01

Between the Witch and the Eagle
by Heather Wokusch | 09-24-01

The Opportunists
by Barton Wong | 09-24-01

Against Machiavellianism
by Barton Wong | 09-24-01

My Generation
by Clare Zulkey | 09-24-01

My President, Right or Wrong
by Clare Zulkey | 09-24-01

Part of Thousands
by Ben Welch | 09-24-01

Games Can Wait
by Andy Stilp | 09-24-01

The End of Ironing
by D.T. Harris | 09-30-01

Reflections on Targeting People by Aerial Bombing
by Barton Wong | 10-07-01

Diplomacy in Depth
by James Norton | 10-10-01

Why 'Let's Roll' Doesn't Rock
by Yancey Strickler | 01-15-02

Review of Before and After
by James Norton | 01-16-02

But Seriously...?
by Clay Risen | 03-15-02

I Come In Peace, America
by Rohit Gupta | 05-02-02

The Moussaoui Show
by Clay Risen | 07-07-02

The World Trade Center Address
by Clay Risen | 09-09-02

Memories and Memorials
by Claire Zulkey | 09-09-02

A Local Tragedy
by Michael Risen | 09-17-02

Unbuilding the Rebuilding
by Clay Risen | 01-08-03

Memory Lapses
by Noam Lupu | 05-16-03

In the Abstract
by Noam Lupu | 01-28-04

Skeletons in the Closet
by J. Daniel Janzen | 07-30-04

Ground Zero
by J. Daniel Janzen | 09-03-04

Happy Sept. 11, Everybody
by James Norton | 09-11-06

9/11 in 2007
by Cary Jackson Broder | 09-11-07

OPINION

Index Page
Archives
Submissions

THE CARTOONS OF ANDREW WAHL

New cartoon every Wednesday
FIGHTING WORDS BY BEN SMITH

New cartoon every Monday
RECENTLY IN OPINION

The 1,001 Worries of Sarah Palin
by James Norton

The 2008 Veepstakes
by Michael Frissore

Bo Diddley, In Memoriam
by Matt Hanson

Ten Years Without Phil Hartman
by Michael Frissore

Myanmar: While the World Waits
by Patrick Burns

March of the Pundits
by Matt Hanson

The Iron's Still Hot
by Charles Moss

Figuring Out Hunter S. Thompson
by Ian M. Clarke

Barack Obama, Child of the '70s
by Edward McClelland

'Tis a Pity They're All Whores
by Eve Adams

More opinion ›

OPINION WRITERS WANTED

Flak seeks writers to write reviews, essays and interviews for its Opinion section. Special emphasis on short, timely takes on major works.

No pay. Some glory. Lots of editorial back-and-forth, and a nice-looking clip for your files. Check out our guidelines for details or contact editor James Norton.



ABOUT FLAK

Help wanted: Winter Intern

About Flak
Archives
Letters to Flak
Submissions
Rec Reading
Rejected!

ALSO BY FLAK

Flak Sunday Comics
The Spam Blog
The Remote
Flak Print [6mb PDF]
Flak Daily Photo

SEARCH FLAK

flakmag.comwww
Powered by Google
MAILING LIST
Sign up for Flak's weekly e-mail updates:

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

spacer

They Hate Us?"They Hate Us"?
by Clay Risen

"They Hate Us." "We Had it Coming." There has been no shortage of poorly worded responses to the events of Sept. 11, but none, perhaps, is as pernicious or offensive as that sentiment spoken by everyone from Martin Amis to Robert Fisk to Susan Sontag, the sentiment that says, in effect, we deserved it.

There have been, of course, other equally ludicrous responses. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson blaming the tragedy on gays and feminists. David Horowitz blaming it on his former leftist fellow travelers. But Falwell and Robertson are merely up to their usual foot-in-mouth antics and Horowitz, as always, is using the events to publicize his narrow-minded anti-liberal crusade. As such, we can safely ignore them.

spacer
Reader Email

"Here in Britain, I'm sickened..." More ›
spacer

But Sontag, Fisk and others are not so easily dismissed. After all, they are intelligent, worldly people, not generally known as blowhards or opportunists. And their message is disarming at the same time as it is disdaining — "You, America, do not understand the world, and so do not know why someone would want to do this. But we do." The attack, many have written, was a reaction to American greed, to American capitalist expansion, to our support for Israel and our sanctions against Iraq. Fisk wrote in The Nation that:

But this is not really the war of democracy versus terror that the world will be asked to believe in the coming days. It is also about US missiles smashing into Palestinian homes and US helicopters firing missiles into a Lebanese ambulance in 1996 and American shells crashing into a village called Qana and about a Lebanese militia — paid and uniformed by America's Israeli ally — hacking and raping and murdering their way through refugee camps.

And Sontag, writing in The New Yorker, said:

Where is the acknowledgment that this was not a 'cowardly' attack on 'civilization' or 'liberty' or 'humanity' or 'the free world' but an attack on the world's self- proclaimed superpower, undertaken as a consequence of specific American alliances and actions?

On the surface, these statements are simplistic in the extreme — the hijackers killed thousands of Americans because they did not like the United States. But taken further, the articles reek of the same generalizations and opportunistic stereotypes they accuse "Americans" of tossing around, the sort of logic they claim led directly to the attack. Beyond the ludicrous image of Sontag, warm in her Manhattan home, claiming to speak for the world's oppressed, these authors imagine a great, huddled mass of nations with a common, deep hatred of the United States, each with its own grievance but united in a desire to lash out. Or, as one comment on the Weblog Metafilter said,

If we continue to treat the third world as little more than a sweat shop to produce cheap oil and Nikes for us then it shouldn't come as much of a surprise when they get angry about this.

The implication being, of course, that the United States is an oppressor state, draining resources and happiness from the rest of the world, and that the oppressed have now cashed in their debts, that the terrorists were doing more than expressing their own anger — they were attacking the Great Satan in the name of a great "They."

But there is no "They." "They" do not hate us, because "they" do not exist. There is no "world" against which the United States is opposed, and even if there were, it is ridiculous to imply, as Fisk does, that the terrorists were acting on "their" behalf. For every American-flag-burning Palestinian there are dozens in Gaza City and the West Bank who wept and prayed for the victims, and there are an equal number who look to the United States as the only nation capable of solving their plight. The "Arab world" does not think ill of America because the "Arab world" does not "think" anything. Rather, each Arab thinks for him or herself, and for Fisk to presuppose that the hijackers were speaking in their collective name is dangerously close to the boorish stereotyping he claims to abhor.

In the wake of any tragedy, the first victim is common sense, and in that vein Fisk, Sontag and others are no more culpable than those who call for bombing Afghanistan "back to the Stone Age," innocents be damned. We all want explanations, and in the rush to explain it is all too easy to forget that the world elides all judgment, that there is never an easy explanation for what happened.

E-mail Clay Risen at risenc@yahoo.com.

ALSO BY …

Also by Clay Risen:
After the Quake
Austerlitz
Blood of Victory
Bobos In Paradise
The Book of Illusions
Censored 2000
Choke
Communazis
Defying Hitler
The Dying Animal
Gig
More by Clay Risen ›

 
spacer
spacer

All materials copyright © 1999-2007 by Flak Magazine

spacer